sourdough: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bread
Weight: 0.52
, loaf
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.51
, starter
Weight: 0.50
, recipe
Weight: 0.48
Siblings brioche
Weight: 0.33
, pita
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, polenta
Weight: 0.33
, tortilla
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
is good for 0.89
is great 0.84
is damn good 0.83
going bad 0.81
go bad 0.80
has quality good 0.80
feel going 0.79
be got do 0.78
be good for dogs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(starter, going bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(starter, go bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(loaf, go bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sourdough, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(starter, going bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(loaf, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(starter, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(starter, going bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(loaf, go bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(starter, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tortilla, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tortilla, is good for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(polenta, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(brioche, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(starter, going bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(starter, go bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(loaf, go bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(tortilla, is good for)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tortilla, is good for)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(tortilla, go bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tortilla, go bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(brioche, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(brioche, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(polenta, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(polenta, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sourdough, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(sourdough, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sourdough, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sourdough, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sourdough, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(loaf, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(starter, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(starter, going bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tortilla, go bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brioche, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tortilla, is good for)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(polenta, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(starter, going bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(loaf, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sourdough, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(starter, go bad)