south africa: be poor with riches

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south korea
Weight: 0.81
, africa
Weight: 0.80
, south america
Weight: 0.78
, latin america
Weight: 0.73
Siblings new zealand
Weight: 0.69
, australia
Weight: 0.66
, germany
Weight: 0.65
, france
Weight: 0.64
, south
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor with riches 1.00
be poor with many riches 0.99
is rich 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(africa, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(south africa, be poor with riches)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(south korea, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(south africa, be poor with riches)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(south korea, is rich)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(africa, is rich)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(south korea, is rich)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(africa, is rich)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(germany, is rich)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(france, is rich)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(australia, is rich)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(africa, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(south korea, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(germany, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(germany, is rich)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(france, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(france, is rich)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(australia, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(australia, is rich)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(south africa, be poor with riches)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with many riches)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(south africa, be poor with many riches)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(south africa, be poor with many riches)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(south africa, be poor with many riches)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is rich)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(south africa, is rich)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(south africa, is rich)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(south africa, is rich)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(south africa, be poor with riches)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(south korea, is rich)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(africa, is rich)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(germany, is rich)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(france, is rich)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(australia, is rich)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(south korea, is rich)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(south africa, be poor with riches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(africa, is rich)