south africa: be regarded as developing country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south korea
Weight: 0.81
, africa
Weight: 0.80
, south america
Weight: 0.78
, latin america
Weight: 0.73
Siblings new zealand
Weight: 0.69
, australia
Weight: 0.66
, germany
Weight: 0.65
, france
Weight: 0.64
, south
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as developing country 1.00
be regarded as country 0.94
be regarded as economy 0.87
be viewed as country 0.87
be viewed as poor country 0.85
be regarded as rainbow nation 0.83
be classed as water country 0.82
be classed as water stressed country 0.81
be regarded as mixed economy 0.81
is more developed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(south africa, be regarded as country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(south africa, be viewed as poor country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, be viewed as country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as rainbow nation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(south africa, be viewed as poor country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(south africa, be viewed as poor country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(south africa, be regarded as economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(south africa, be regarded as rainbow nation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as rainbow nation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(south africa, be viewed as country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(south africa, be viewed as country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as rainbow nation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be viewed as poor country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as mixed economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south africa, be classed as water country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as mixed economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(south africa, be classed as water stressed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(south africa, be regarded as mixed economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(south africa, be classed as water stressed country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(south africa, be classed as water country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(south africa, be classed as water country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(south africa, be classed as water stressed country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(south africa, is more developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(south africa, is more developed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(south africa, is more developed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be classed as water stressed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is more developed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as mixed economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be classed as water country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be viewed as country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)