south dakota: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north dakota
Weight: 0.75
, area
Weight: 0.70
, state
Weight: 0.67
, utah
Weight: 0.65
Siblings black hills
Weight: 0.57
, south carolina
Weight: 0.39
, north carolina
Weight: 0.39
, south
Weight: 0.38
, north
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(south carolina, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(south carolina, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(south carolina, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(south dakota, is boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(south dakota, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(south dakota, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(south dakota, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(south carolina, is boring)