south pole: receive insolation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot spot
Weight: 0.61
, pole
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.58
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.86
, telephone pole
Weight: 0.39
, west point
Weight: 0.35
, south
Weight: 0.35
, west
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
receive insolation 1.00
receive more insolation 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(pole, receive more insolation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(south pole, receive insolation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pole, receive more insolation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pole, receive more insolation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(pole, receive more insolation)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(south pole, receive insolation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(south pole, receive insolation)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(south pole, receive more insolation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(south pole, receive more insolation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(south pole, receive more insolation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(south pole, receive more insolation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(south pole, receive insolation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(south pole, receive insolation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pole, receive more insolation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(south pole, receive insolation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pole, receive more insolation)