southwest: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.64
, area
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, north america
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west
Weight: 0.38
, south
Weight: 0.37
, north
Weight: 0.37
, south dakota
Weight: 0.37
, northwest
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(west, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(west, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(west, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(southwest, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(southwest, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(southwest, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(southwest, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(southwest, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(southwest, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(southwest, is best)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(southwest, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(southwest, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(southwest, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(southwest, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(southwest, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(west, is best)