spa: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salon
Weight: 0.70
, hotel
Weight: 0.68
, hotel room
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.59
, facility
Weight: 0.58
Siblings beauty salon
Weight: 0.35
, concierge
Weight: 0.34
, barber shop
Weight: 0.34
, sauna
Weight: 0.33
, shopping center
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
be good for health 0.80
feel good 0.80
has quality shit 0.79
has quality prices 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(salon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spa, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spa, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spa, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spa, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(salon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(salon, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has quality prices)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sauna, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sauna, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sauna, be good for health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sauna, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(salon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spa, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spa, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spa, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spa, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sauna, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sauna, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sauna, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sauna, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(barber shop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(barber shop, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sauna, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sauna, be good for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sauna, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sauna, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(spa, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(spa, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(spa, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spa, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spa, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, has quality prices)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(salon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sauna, be good for health)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sauna, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(barber shop, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sauna, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sauna, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(salon, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(spa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, has quality prices)