spa: is cloudy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salon
Weight: 0.70
, hotel
Weight: 0.68
, hotel room
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.59
, facility
Weight: 0.58
Siblings beauty salon
Weight: 0.35
, concierge
Weight: 0.34
, barber shop
Weight: 0.34
, sauna
Weight: 0.33
, shopping center
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cloudy 1.00
is humid 0.76
is dry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hotel room, is humid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spa, is cloudy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(hotel room, is dry)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spa, is cloudy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is dry)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is humid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is dry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is humid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hotel room, is humid)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(spa, is cloudy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(hotel room, is dry)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(spa, is cloudy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(spa, is cloudy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spa, is cloudy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, is dry)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hotel room, is humid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, is dry)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(spa, is cloudy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hotel room, is humid)