spa: use hot rocks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salon
Weight: 0.70
, hotel
Weight: 0.68
, hotel room
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.59
, facility
Weight: 0.58
Siblings beauty salon
Weight: 0.35
, concierge
Weight: 0.34
, barber shop
Weight: 0.34
, sauna
Weight: 0.33
, shopping center
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use hot rocks 1.00
use rocks 0.92
have rocks 0.88
is hot 0.83
give hot towels 0.77
get rid of hot tubs 0.77
remove hot tubs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hotel room, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spa, use hot rocks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hotel, get rid of hot tubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spa, use hot rocks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hotel, get rid of hot tubs)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hotel, get rid of hot tubs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sauna, have rocks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hotel room, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(spa, use hot rocks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hotel, get rid of hot tubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(spa, use hot rocks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sauna, have rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sauna, have rocks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(spa, use hot rocks)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spa, use rocks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(spa, use rocks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(spa, use rocks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(spa, use rocks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spa, use hot rocks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hotel, get rid of hot tubs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hotel room, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sauna, have rocks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hotel, get rid of hot tubs)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spa, use hot rocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hotel room, is hot)