spam: be at can

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, spammer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at can 1.00
be at we do not understand 0.78
do not work well 0.76
be happen without your know 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spam, be at can)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(thing, be happen without your know) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spam, be at can)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spam, be at can)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(spam, be at can)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(thing, be happen without your know) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(spam, be at can)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(spam, be at can)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(spam, be at can)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spam, be at can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(spam, be at can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)