spam: be at your inbox

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, spammer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at your inbox 1.00
be find in mailbox 0.77
be deliver to mailbox 0.77
be receive in mailbox 0.76
get put into mailbox 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mail, be find in mailbox)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mail, get put into mailbox)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mail, be receive in mailbox)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mail, be deliver to mailbox)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mail, be deliver to mailbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mail, be deliver to mailbox)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mail, be receive in mailbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mail, be receive in mailbox)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mail, be find in mailbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mail, be find in mailbox)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mail, get put into mailbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mail, get put into mailbox)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(spam, be at your inbox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spam, be at your inbox)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(mail, be receive in mailbox)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mail, be deliver to mailbox)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mail, get put into mailbox)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spam, be at your inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mail, be find in mailbox)