:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(thing, happen)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(spam, be thing)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(thing, happen)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, happen)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(thing, happen)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(spam, be thing)
Salient implies Plausible
0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(spam, be thing)
Similarity expansion
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(spam, is thing)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spam, is thing)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(spam, is bad thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spam, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(spam, is bad thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(spam, happen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(spam, happen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(spam, is thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spam, happen)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(spam, happen)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(spam, be thing)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(thing, happen)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(spam, be thing)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(thing, happen)