spam: have reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, risk
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, trojan
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have reputation 1.00
have bad reputation 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(spam, have reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(spam, have bad reputation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(spam, have bad reputation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(spam, have bad reputation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(spam, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(spam, have reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spam, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(spam, have reputation)