speaker: be important in school for scandal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.64
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, presentation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings president
Weight: 0.70
, bill gates
Weight: 0.61
, ceo
Weight: 0.59
, lecturer
Weight: 0.57
, presenter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in school for scandal 1.00
be important in school 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(presentation, be important in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(speaker, be important in school for scandal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in school)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(presentation, be important in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(speaker, be important in school for scandal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(speaker, be important in school for scandal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(speaker, be important in school)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(speaker, be important in school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(speaker, be important in school)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be important in school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be important in school for scandal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(speaker, be important in school for scandal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(speaker, be important in school for scandal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in school)