speaker: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.64
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, presentation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings president
Weight: 0.70
, bill gates
Weight: 0.61
, ceo
Weight: 0.59
, lecturer
Weight: 0.57
, presenter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
stop working 0.80
work on computer 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ceo, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ceo, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ceo, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(speaker, work)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(speaker, stop working)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(speaker, work on computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(speaker, work on computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(speaker, stop working)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(speaker, work on computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(speaker, stop working)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(speaker, work on computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(speaker, stop working)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(speaker, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(speaker, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(speaker, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ceo, work)