speaking: have important skills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents act
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, sound
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.35
, talk
Weight: 0.33
, spoke
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important skills 1.00
have skills 0.97
using communication skills 0.88
using oral communication skills 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(speaking, have important skills)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(speaking, have skills)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(speaking, have skills)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(speaking, have skills)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(speaking, using communication skills)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(speaking, have skills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(speaking, using oral communication skills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(speaking, using oral communication skills)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(speaking, using communication skills)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(speaking, using communication skills)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(speaking, using oral communication skills)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speaking, using communication skills)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(speaking, using oral communication skills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(speaking, have important skills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(speaking, have important skills)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(speaking, have important skills)