specialization: improve standards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve standards 1.00
improve standards of living 0.97
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(niche, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(socialization, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(socialization, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(socialization, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(niche, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(niche, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(specialization, improve standards)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards of living)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(specialization, improve standards of living)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, improve standards of living)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(specialization, improve standards of living)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(specialization, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(specialization, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(specialization, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(specialization, improve standards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(socialization, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, improve standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(niche, has quality good)