specialization: is useful biology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful biology 1.00
is biology 0.94
is useful 0.80
be important in study of economics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(design pattern, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(design pattern, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(specialization, is useful biology)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(specialization, is biology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(specialization, is biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(specialization, is biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(specialization, is useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(specialization, is biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(specialization, is useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(specialization, is useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in study of economics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(specialization, is useful biology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(specialization, is useful biology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(specialization, is useful biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(design pattern, is useful)