speciation: develop from geographic isolation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, event
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings meiosis
Weight: 0.34
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.34
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.34
, evolution
Weight: 0.34
, apoptosis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop from geographic isolation 1.00
occur as result of geographic isolation 0.92
develop from isolation 0.92
require isolation 0.86
occur as result of isolation 0.82
require reproductive isolation 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(speciation, develop from isolation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(speciation, develop from isolation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(speciation, require isolation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(speciation, require isolation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(speciation, require isolation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(speciation, develop from isolation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(speciation, develop from isolation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speciation, require reproductive isolation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(speciation, require isolation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(speciation, occur as result of geographic isolation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(speciation, occur as result of isolation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(speciation, require reproductive isolation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(speciation, require reproductive isolation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(speciation, require reproductive isolation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(speciation, develop from geographic isolation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(speciation, develop from geographic isolation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(speciation, develop from geographic isolation)