species: have more precise than common names names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings chinook salmon
Weight: 0.78
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more precise than common names names 1.00
has state names 0.83
have unique scientific name 0.75
have binomial name 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(species, have more precise than common names names)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(species, has state names)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(species, has state names)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(species, has state names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(species, have binomial name)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(species, have unique scientific name)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(species, have binomial name)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(species, have binomial name)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(species, have unique scientific name)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(species, have unique scientific name)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(species, has state names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, have binomial name)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(species, have unique scientific name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(species, have more precise than common names names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(species, have more precise than common names names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(species, have more precise than common names names)