species: were affected after break up of pangae

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings chinook salmon
Weight: 0.78
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
were affected after break up of pangae 1.00
were affected by break up of pangaea 0.98
change through time 0.76
change over time 0.75
changed over time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(species, were affected after break up of pangae)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(species, were affected by break up of pangaea)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(species, were affected by break up of pangaea)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(species, were affected by break up of pangaea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(species, change through time)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(species, change over time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(species, change through time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(species, change through time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(species, change over time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(species, change over time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(species, were affected by break up of pangaea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(species, change over time)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(species, change through time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(species, were affected after break up of pangae)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(species, were affected after break up of pangae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(species, were affected after break up of pangae)