spectrophotometer: be better than colorimeter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.55
, apparatus
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.53
, detector
Weight: 0.49
Siblings colorimeter
Weight: 0.37
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.35
, calorimeter
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than colorimeter 1.00
be known as photometer 0.79
be used in confocal microscopy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(laser, be used in confocal microscopy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(laser, be used in confocal microscopy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(laser, be used in confocal microscopy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, be known as photometer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(spectrophotometer, be known as photometer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, be known as photometer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be known as photometer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be better than colorimeter)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laser, be used in confocal microscopy)