speech: be to text

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to text 1.00
be to text broken 0.88
be to text broken again 0.84
be even conveyed through text 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tone, be even conveyed through text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(speech, be to text)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tone, be even conveyed through text)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tone, be even conveyed through text)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tone, be even conveyed through text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, be to text)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(speech, be to text)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(speech, be to text broken again)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(speech, be to text broken again)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(speech, be to text broken again)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(speech, be to text broken again)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(speech, be to text)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(speech, be to text)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tone, be even conveyed through text)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(speech, be to text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tone, be even conveyed through text)