speed: affect quality of picture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.70
, ability
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, trot
Weight: 0.34
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33
, frequency
Weight: 0.33
, patience
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect quality of picture 1.00
affect photographs 0.81
improve photographs 0.79
affect color 0.79
affect video 0.78
affect dslr video 0.77
is quality 0.77
is important quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(frequency, affect color)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patience, is important quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patience, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(frequency, affect color)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(frequency, affect color)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patience, is quality)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(patience, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patience, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(patience, is important quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(speed, affect quality of picture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(speed, affect quality of picture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(frequency, affect color)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(patience, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speed, affect quality of picture)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(patience, is important quality)