spending: has degree zip

Related concepts

Parents	activity Weight: 0.66 , bill Weight: 0.58 , behavior Weight: 0.58 , policy Weight: 0.57 , factor Weight: 0.57
Siblings	business activity Weight: 0.35 , sexual activity Weight: 0.34 , dollar bill Weight: 0.33 , consumption Weight: 0.33 , appropriation Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has degree zip	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(dollar bill, has degree zip)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(dollar bill, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(dollar bill, has degree zip)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(spending, has degree zip)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(spending, has degree zip)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(spending, has degree zip)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(spending, has degree zip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(dollar bill, has degree zip)