sperm whale: have bottom teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whale
Weight: 0.82
, dolphin
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.73
, endangered species
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.43
, fin whale
Weight: 0.43
, whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, blue whale
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bottom teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(whale shark, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sperm whale, has physical part teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sperm whale, has physical part teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sperm whale, has physical part teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sperm whale, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sperm whale, have bottom teeth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(whale shark, has physical part teeth)