spike: be in blood sugar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents anomaly
Weight: 0.61
, danger
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.54
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, heating element
Weight: 0.31
, shift
Weight: 0.30
, turn
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in blood sugar 1.00
be in blood sugar bad 0.98
drink milk 0.79
be bad in insulin 0.75
be risk in flour mills 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(explosion, be risk in flour mills)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(explosion, be risk in flour mills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(explosion, be risk in flour mills)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(spike, be in blood sugar)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(spike, be in blood sugar bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(spike, be in blood sugar bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(spike, be in blood sugar bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spike, be in blood sugar bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spike, be bad in insulin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spike, be bad in insulin)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(spike, be bad in insulin)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(spike, be bad in insulin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spike, be in blood sugar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(spike, be in blood sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spike, be in blood sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(explosion, be risk in flour mills)