spike: be in electricity consumption

Related concepts

Parents	anomaly Weight: 0.61 , danger Weight: 0.58 , hazard Weight: 0.58 , part Weight: 0.55 , character Weight: 0.54
Siblings	explosion Weight: 0.31 , concern Weight: 0.31 , heating element Weight: 0.31 , shift Weight: 0.30 , turn Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in electricity consumption	1.00
be in supply	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(shift, be in supply)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(shift, be in supply) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(shift, be in supply)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(spike, be in electricity consumption)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(spike, be in electricity consumption)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(spike, be in electricity consumption)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(spike, be in electricity consumption) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(shift, be in supply)