spike: is network

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents anomaly
Weight: 0.61
, danger
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.54
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, heating element
Weight: 0.31
, shift
Weight: 0.30
, turn
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is network 1.00
is now network 0.96
work in network 0.96
is now paramount network 0.79
is paramount network 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(turn, work in network)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(turn, work in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(turn, work in network)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(spike, is network)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(spike, is now network)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(spike, is now network)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(spike, is now network)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(spike, is now paramount network)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(spike, is paramount network)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spike, is paramount network)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(spike, is now paramount network)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(spike, is now network)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(spike, is paramount network)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(spike, is now paramount network)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spike, is paramount network)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(spike, is now paramount network)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(spike, is network)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(spike, is network)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(spike, is network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(turn, work in network)