spill: be bad for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.66
, hazard
Weight: 0.64
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
Siblings leak
Weight: 0.36
, explosion
Weight: 0.35
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, crash
Weight: 0.34
, plane crash
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for animals 1.00
taste good to humans 0.77
be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(substance, be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(spill, be bad for animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(substance, be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(substance, be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(substance, be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(spill, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(spill, be bad for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(spill, be bad for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(spill, be bad for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(substance, be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(spill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(substance, be more poisonous than just two substances by themseves)