splint: be vs night guard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, article
Weight: 0.48
, equipment
Weight: 0.45
, product
Weight: 0.45
, ankle
Weight: 0.44
Siblings wrist
Weight: 0.34
, implant
Weight: 0.33
, cleat
Weight: 0.33
, helmet
Weight: 0.33
, velcro
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs night guard 1.00
be vs cast 0.79
has position guard 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(device, has position guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(splint, be vs night guard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(device, has position guard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(device, has position guard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(device, has position guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(splint, be vs night guard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(splint, be vs night guard)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(splint, be vs cast)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(splint, be vs cast)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(splint, be vs cast)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(splint, be vs cast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(splint, be vs night guard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(splint, be vs night guard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(device, has position guard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(splint, be vs night guard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(device, has position guard)