split: be connected to unbreakable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, member
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.51
Siblings separation
Weight: 0.33
, rift
Weight: 0.32
, friction
Weight: 0.32
, schism
Weight: 0.31
, tie
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected to unbreakable 1.00
be related to unbreakable 0.96
be linked to unbreakable 0.96
be secret sequel to unbreakable 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(split, be connected to unbreakable)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(split, be linked to unbreakable)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(split, be related to unbreakable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(split, be secret sequel to unbreakable)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(split, be secret sequel to unbreakable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(split, be linked to unbreakable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(split, be related to unbreakable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(split, be linked to unbreakable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(split, be linked to unbreakable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(split, be secret sequel to unbreakable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(split, be related to unbreakable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(split, be related to unbreakable)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(split, be secret sequel to unbreakable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(split, be connected to unbreakable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(split, be connected to unbreakable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(split, be connected to unbreakable)