sport: be dangerous

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, attraction
Weight: 0.61
Siblings professional football
Weight: 0.74
, football team
Weight: 0.73
, basketball player
Weight: 0.72
, baseball game
Weight: 0.72
, golf club
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous 1.00
be dangerous when there be no control 0.81
be more dangerous than ultimate 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(attraction, be dangerous when there be no control)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(attraction, be dangerous when there be no control)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be dangerous when there be no control)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(professional football, be more dangerous than ultimate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(attraction, be dangerous when there be no control)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sport, be dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(professional football, be more dangerous than ultimate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(professional football, be more dangerous than ultimate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(sport, be dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attraction, be dangerous when there be no control)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(professional football, be more dangerous than ultimate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attraction, be dangerous when there be no control)