sport: be related to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, attraction
Weight: 0.61
Siblings auto racing
Weight: 0.77
, professional football
Weight: 0.74
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.73
, football team
Weight: 0.73
, professional wrestling
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to technology 1.00
be related 0.83
is related 0.83
be related to types 0.80
be related to types of government 0.79
be related to transportation 0.77
be related to money 0.77
be related to health 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(attraction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sport, be related to technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(attraction, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(attraction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sport, be related to technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sport, be related to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related to transportation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related to money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related to health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sport, be related to transportation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sport, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sport, be related to health)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sport, be related to transportation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sport, be related to health)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sport, be related to transportation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sport, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sport, be related to health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sport, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sport, be related to money)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sport, be related to money)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sport, be related to money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sport, be related to technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(attraction, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sport, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(attraction, be related)