sports car: have back seats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have back seats 1.00
have two seats 0.96
has physical part seats 0.93
bother with seats 0.91
bother with rear seats 0.89
bother with useless rear seats 0.85
bother with useless seats 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(sports car, have back seats)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sports car, have two seats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sports car, has physical part seats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sports car, bother with seats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sports car, has physical part seats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sports car, bother with seats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sports car, bother with useless seats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sports car, bother with rear seats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sports car, bother with seats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(sports car, bother with useless seats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sports car, bother with useless rear seats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sports car, bother with useless seats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sports car, bother with useless rear seats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sports car, bother with useless rear seats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sports car, have two seats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sports car, bother with rear seats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sports car, bother with rear seats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sports car, have two seats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(sports car, has physical part seats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sports car, bother with seats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have two seats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sports car, bother with useless rear seats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sports car, bother with useless seats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sports car, has physical part seats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sports car, bother with rear seats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have back seats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sports car, have back seats)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sports car, have back seats)