sports car: have fat tires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fat tires 1.00
have tires 0.93
have large tires 0.91
have wide tires 0.88
get bad gas mileage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sports car, have fat tires)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sports car, have tires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(sports car, have large tires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sports car, have tires)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sports car, have tires)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(sports car, have wide tires)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sports car, have large tires)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sports car, have large tires)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(sports car, have wide tires)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sports car, have wide tires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(sports car, get bad gas mileage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sports car, get bad gas mileage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sports car, get bad gas mileage)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have large tires)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have wide tires)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have tires)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sports car, get bad gas mileage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have fat tires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have fat tires)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sports car, have fat tires)