sports team: have tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.58
, group
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.36
Siblings baseball team
Weight: 0.36
, national league
Weight: 0.35
, league
Weight: 0.35
, club
Weight: 0.32
, functional group
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tax 1.00
have exempt tax 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(organization, have exempt tax)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sports team, have tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(organization, have exempt tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(organization, have exempt tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(organization, have exempt tax)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sports team, have tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(sports team, have tax)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sports team, have exempt tax)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sports team, have exempt tax)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sports team, have exempt tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sports team, have exempt tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sports team, have tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sports team, have tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(organization, have exempt tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sports team, have tax)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(organization, have exempt tax)