sportsman: take ice baths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
, citizen
Weight: 0.49
, individual
Weight: 0.48
, celebrity
Weight: 0.47
Siblings golfer
Weight: 0.49
, skier
Weight: 0.45
, outfitter
Weight: 0.45
, professional wrestling
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
take ice baths 1.00
have ice baths 0.98
use ice baths 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(skier, take ice baths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(skier, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(skier, take ice baths)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(sportsman, take ice baths)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(sportsman, have ice baths)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(sportsman, use ice baths)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(sportsman, have ice baths)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(sportsman, use ice baths)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sportsman, have ice baths)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sportsman, use ice baths)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sportsman, use ice baths)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sportsman, have ice baths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sportsman, take ice baths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sportsman, take ice baths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sportsman, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(skier, take ice baths)