spot: be in then others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.67
, element
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings location
Weight: 0.66
, foot
Weight: 0.62
, bar
Weight: 0.62
, corner
Weight: 0.60
, linebacker
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in then others 1.00
come back in same place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(spot, be in then others)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spot, come back in same place)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(spot, come back in same place)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(spot, come back in same place)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spot, come back in same place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(spot, be in then others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(spot, be in then others)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spot, be in then others)