sprinkler: be ban in most australian state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, fire
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.55
, water
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.34
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.34
, water heater
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ban in most australian state 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(sprinkler, be ban in most australian state)