sprinkler: wet garden

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, fire
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.55
, water
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.34
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.34
, water heater
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wet garden 1.00
be used to water garden 0.89
be at garden 0.89
be wet 0.88
wet person 0.85
wet plant 0.84
feel wet 0.83
be used to grow garden 0.82
wet glass 0.82
wet everything 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(water, be wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sprinkler, wet garden)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(water, be wet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(water, be wet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(water, be wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sprinkler, wet garden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sprinkler, wet garden)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sprinkler, be used to water garden)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(sprinkler, be used to water garden)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, be used to water garden)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sprinkler, be used to water garden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, wet garden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sprinkler, wet garden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(water, be wet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sprinkler, wet garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(water, be wet)