spy: wants to information

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.56
, agent
Weight: 0.56
, book
Weight: 0.51
, program
Weight: 0.50
, element
Weight: 0.47
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.32
, movie
Weight: 0.31
, movie star
Weight: 0.31
, commando
Weight: 0.31
, hacker
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to information 1.00
be used to information 0.95
be used to store information 0.87
has family information 0.86
be used to study information 0.84
be used to information process 0.83
gather information about computer 0.83
be used to pass on information 0.83
be interest in important information 0.82
be used to collect information 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(book, be used to information)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(spy, wants to information)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(book, be used to store information)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(spy, wants to information)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(book, be used to information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(book, be used to store information)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(book, be used to information)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(book, be used to store information)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hacker, gather information about computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(book, be used to information)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(spy, wants to information)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(book, be used to store information)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(spy, wants to information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hacker, gather information about computer)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(hacker, gather information about computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(spy, wants to information)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spy, be interest in important information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(spy, be interest in important information)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(spy, be interest in important information)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spy, be interest in important information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(spy, wants to information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(book, be used to information)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(book, be used to store information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hacker, gather information about computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(book, be used to information)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(spy, wants to information)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(book, be used to store information)