sql: be better than access

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.65
, programming language
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, standard
Weight: 0.53
, format
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.36
, perl
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35
, english language
Weight: 0.35
, css
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than access 1.00
has quality better 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sql, be better than access)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sql, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sql, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sql, be better than access)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(sql, be better than access)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sql, be better than access)