sql: is non procedural language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.65
, programming language
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, standard
Weight: 0.53
, format
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.36
, perl
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35
, english language
Weight: 0.35
, css
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non procedural language 1.00
is procedural language 0.98
is non language 0.83
is language 0.80
is nonprocedural language 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(english language, is language)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(english language, is language)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(english language, is language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sql, is non procedural language)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(sql, is procedural language)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(sql, is non language)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sql, is procedural language)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(sql, is nonprocedural language)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sql, is language)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sql, is non procedural language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sql, is non procedural language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sql, is non procedural language)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(english language, is language)