squirrel: be called squirrels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, owl
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called squirrels 1.00
be mean to grey squirrels 0.96
be mean to squirrels 0.96
kill squirrels 0.95
be better than squirrels 0.93
kill red squirrels 0.93
be called flying squirrels 0.93
understand squirrels 0.93
be better than red squirrels 0.92
understand other squirrels 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be mean to grey squirrels)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be mean to squirrels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red squirrel, be mean to squirrels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, be mean to squirrels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red squirrel, be mean to grey squirrels)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, be mean to grey squirrels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(squirrel, be called squirrels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be called squirrels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(squirrel, be called squirrels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be mean to grey squirrels)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be called squirrels)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be mean to squirrels)