squirrel: have fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, owl
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fur 1.00
pull out fur 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(owl, have fur)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(red squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have fur)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(owl, have fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(owl, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(squirrel, have fur)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, pull out fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(squirrel, pull out fur)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(squirrel, pull out fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(squirrel, pull out fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(squirrel, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(owl, have fur)