stabilization: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.50
, question
Weight: 0.47
, feature
Weight: 0.47
Siblings recovery
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, growth
Weight: 0.33
, construction
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(stabilization, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(stabilization, has quality function)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(stabilization, has quality function)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(stabilization, has quality function)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(stabilization, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(stabilization, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stabilization, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(stabilization, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)