stadium: be named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.67
, place
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings old trafford
Weight: 0.51
, hippodrome
Weight: 0.43
, football field
Weight: 0.35
, city hall
Weight: 0.35
, baseball stadium
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named 1.00
get named 0.96
be named after companies 0.79
be named after banks 0.76
be nicknamed theathre 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(old trafford, be nicknamed theathre)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(old trafford, be nicknamed theathre)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(old trafford, be nicknamed theathre)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(stadium, be named)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(stadium, be named after banks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(stadium, be named after banks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stadium, be named after companies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(stadium, be named after companies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stadium, be named after banks)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stadium, be named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stadium, be named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stadium, be named)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(old trafford, be nicknamed theathre)