stadium: get smaller

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.67
, place
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings old trafford
Weight: 0.51
, hippodrome
Weight: 0.43
, football field
Weight: 0.35
, city hall
Weight: 0.35
, baseball stadium
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get smaller 1.00
is smaller 0.96
is smaller now 0.94
is bigger 0.87
has size small 0.79
has size large 0.79
have different ones 0.76
is big 0.76
be better than first 0.76
have many different ones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(football field, is bigger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(baseball stadium, is smaller)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(old trafford, is big)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(baseball stadium, is smaller now)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(baseball stadium, has size large)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(baseball stadium, is smaller now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(baseball stadium, is smaller now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(baseball stadium, is smaller)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(baseball stadium, is smaller)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(football field, is bigger)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(football field, is bigger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(baseball stadium, has size large)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(baseball stadium, has size large)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(old trafford, is big)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(old trafford, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(stadium, get smaller)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(stadium, has size small)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(stadium, has size small)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stadium, has size small)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(stadium, has size small)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stadium, get smaller)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(baseball stadium, is smaller now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(baseball stadium, is smaller)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(football field, is bigger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(old trafford, is big)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stadium, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(baseball stadium, has size large)