stairs: be in middle of woods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.35
Siblings stairwell
Weight: 0.29
, staircase
Weight: 0.29
, basement
Weight: 0.28
, doorway
Weight: 0.28
, ground floor
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in middle of woods 1.00
be in woods 0.96
be in middle of forest 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(staircase, be in woods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(staircase, be in woods)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(staircase, be in woods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(stairs, be in middle of woods)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(stairs, be in woods)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(stairs, be in woods)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be in woods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(stairs, be in woods)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be in middle of forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(stairs, be in middle of forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(stairs, be in middle of forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(stairs, be in middle of forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be in middle of woods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(stairs, be in middle of woods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be in middle of woods)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(staircase, be in woods)